<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the Winner is&#8230; &#8220;Writing Better Mixed Integer Programming Models&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://blogs.ilog.com/events/2008/02/27/and-the-winner-is-writing-better-mixed-integer-programming-models/</link>
	<description>Notes from ILOG events around the globbe</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tallys</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ilog.com/events/2008/02/27/and-the-winner-is-writing-better-mixed-integer-programming-models/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ilog.com/events/2008/02/27/and-the-winner-is-writing-better-mixed-integer-programming-models/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I'd like to watch the video of this presentation. Do you know where and when it will be posted? Thanks, Tallys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to watch the video of this presentation. Do you know where and when it will be posted? Thanks, Tallys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irv Lustig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ilog.com/events/2008/02/27/and-the-winner-is-writing-better-mixed-integer-programming-models/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Irv Lustig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ilog.com/events/2008/02/27/and-the-winner-is-writing-better-mixed-integer-programming-models/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>We revoted at the conference so that we would have more votes.  The original voting had CP winning by 1 vote, and only small participation, so by revoting, we ended up with 3 times the participation.  So the vote was not rigged!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We revoted at the conference so that we would have more votes.  The original voting had CP winning by 1 vote, and only small participation, so by revoting, we ended up with 3 times the participation.  So the vote was not rigged!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
