<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maven, Eclipse and OSGi working together</title>
	<link>http://blogs.ilog.com/brms/2008/03/17/maven-eclipse-and-osgi-working-together/</link>
	<description>Commentary and news on business rule management systems and rules engines</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor Schrader</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ilog.com/brms/2008/03/17/maven-eclipse-and-osgi-working-together/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Schrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ilog.com/brms/2008/03/17/maven-eclipse-and-osgi-working-together/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>I've come to appreciate Maven2, although it is a bit obtuse to the software developer.  You get from it what you put in, as in, setup your own repository!  And by the way, a cheer to the q4e guys for the dev code!  -- TTMDev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to appreciate Maven2, although it is a bit obtuse to the software developer.  You get from it what you put in, as in, setup your own repository!  And by the way, a cheer to the q4e guys for the dev code!  &#8212; TTMDev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter lin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ilog.com/brms/2008/03/17/maven-eclipse-and-osgi-working-together/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>peter lin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ilog.com/brms/2008/03/17/maven-eclipse-and-osgi-working-together/#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Although many people love Maven2, I'm in the minority. Maven2 tends to become a huge maintenance overhead. I've used before when I was working at IBM. My personal bias is that ANT is more than sufficient to get the job done without all the annoying things in maven. Probably the worse part of maven is the repository. Other repositories seem to work fine, but maven repository seems to suck. my bias 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although many people love Maven2, I&#8217;m in the minority. Maven2 tends to become a huge maintenance overhead. I&#8217;ve used before when I was working at IBM. My personal bias is that ANT is more than sufficient to get the job done without all the annoying things in maven. Probably the worse part of maven is the repository. Other repositories seem to work fine, but maven repository seems to suck. my bias 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
